Thesis sentence: I strongly believe that higher education should be available for everyone.
First argument: Higher education should be distributed to everyone especially the one who work harder.
Second argument: University also should focus on their main objective which is to provide education.
Third argument: Professor or lecturer should also give their effort to teach every student no matter how their economic condition is.
Counter-argument:
- Many people think that higher education should available only to those who have enough money.
- One of my friends said that no need to take higher education such as university because grade in class can be bought.
Rebuttal:
- Education Fund Management Institution (LPDP) allocating scholarship funds amounted Rp3 trillion for the year 2017.
- Buying grade only available in high school
Conclusion: Now, it is up to us to think whether education should be available to everyone or not.
According to Galindo and Rodriguez (2015) Beyond the economic dimension, higher education plays an important role in social growth, by reducing the risk of social exclusion for those vulnerable groups that have access to postsecondary education. This economic-education issue itself is still debated until now. However, I strongly believe that higher education should be available for everyone.
Higher education should be distributed to everyone especially the one who work harder. The meritarian view of justice is that the good things in life should be equally distributed at the outset as a starting point of competition and be assessed at the end-results. The competitive meritarian justice concerns those who work hard and deserve or merit more than those who do not (Deutsch, 1989, p. 142). One example of hard work man, Kenny Troutt grew up with a bartender dad and paid for his own tuition at Southern Illinois University by selling life insurance. He made most of his money from phone company Excel Communications, which he founded in 1988 and took public in 1996. Two years later, Troutt merged his company with Teleglobe in a $3.5 billion deal. Education and skills that come from hard work are walks together (Cainarca and Sgobbi, (2012).
University also should focus on their main objective which is to provide education. In February 1970, with the school’s storied quadrangle by the Charles River still in the grip of winter, Harvard University broke the bad news to students and their parents: Tuition was going up. Their reluctant consensus raised the annual cost of attending the prestigious school in the fall of 1971 by $200—to $2,600. It was the first time since 1949 that the school, which was chartered in 1650, had boosted tuition two years in a row. (Doost, 1997) Totalling university costs and dividing them by their total enrolments (adjusted for the full-time equivalent headcount) is often misleading because universities often engage in a lot of other activities which are beyond the narrow scope of teaching.
Professor or lecturer should also give their effort to teach every student no matter how their economic condition is. A teacher’s role involves more than simply standing in front of a classroom and lecturing. According to Gray and Mearman (2006), the professional lecturer must know the strengths and weaknesses of his students and must be involved in the progress of his students. In fact, even though a teacher spends the majority of the day in the classroom, the actual teaching component is only part of the job. An effective teacher understands that teaching involves wearing multiple hats to ensure that the school day runs smoothly and all students receive a quality education. The equalitarianism principle of benefit mandates professors to consider extrinsically added values when evaluating the characters of students. Parhizgar (2003) The equalitarianism principle of benefit mandates professors to consider extrinsically added values when evaluating the characters of students.
Many people think that higher education should available only to those who have enough money. I realize that some people may believe that economic condition plays an important role in reaching higher education. But this statement will not further to be valid. That because according to Primadhyta (2016), Education Fund Management Institution (LPDP) allocating scholarship funds amounted Rp3 trillion for the year 2017. The fund is planned to be distributed to 12.119 on-going LPDP recipients (2017, LPDP siapkan Rp. 3 Triliun beasiswa untuk 12 ribu orang, para. 1). One of my friends said that no need to take higher education such as university because grade in class can be bought. I think his statement is not right. In my opinion, his idea only happens in high school. According to Block and Dauterive (2007) political, collusion and corruption should be eliminated in university. University is the place for educated people and most of the success people born from a university.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that higher education should be available for everyone. I think what John F. Kennedy said was very suitable for this argument, which is “Not everyone has equal abilities, but everyone should have equal opportunity for education.” Now, it is up to us to think whether education should be available to everyone or not.
REFERENCES
Martha Zapata Galindo,, Rocío Ramírez Rodríguez, (2015), Policies for Social Inclusion and Equity in Higher Education in Europe, in Robert T. Teranishi, Loni Bordoloi Pazich, Marcelo Knobel, Walter R. Allen (ed.) Mitigating Inequality: Higher Education Research, Policy, and Practice in an Era of Massification and Stratification (Advances in Education in Diverse Communities: Research, Policy and Praxis, Volume 11) Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp.311 – 336
Kamal Dean Parhizgar, (2010) “Comparative ethical analysis of educational competition in academia: Massification and elitism in higher education”, Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal, Vol. 20 Iss: 1, pp.72 – 84
Roger K. Doost, (1997),”Intrinsic value of higher education”, Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 12 Iss 2 pp. 87 – 90
Gian Carlo Cainarca, Francesca Sgobbi, (2012) “The return to education and skills in Italy”, International Journal of Manpower, Vol. 33 Iss: 2, pp.187 – 205
Peter Clarke, David Gray, Andrew Mearman, (2006) “The marketing curriculum and educational aims: towards a professional education?”, Marketing Intelligence & Planning, Vol. 24 Iss: 3, pp.189 – 201
Walter Block, Jerry Dauterive, (2007) “Political correctness and the economics of higher education”, Humanomics, Vol. 23 Iss: 4, pp.230 – 239